Clinical & Research Statistics
- Study design & power analysis
- Bayesian & frequentist modeling
- Interim monitoring & adaptive designs
- Manuscript-ready results & interpretation
I’m building a small consulting practice alongside my academic work. The goal: give research teams clear statistical guidance, working code, and documentation they can actually maintain.
Thornton Statistical Consulting is new. I’m building the first client roster while supporting students and collaborators from my academic work.
Who I support
Services
About
Statistician, software builder, and research advisor. I move between R/Python notebooks, registrational study plans, and production codebases without handing anything off to chance.
The job is to uncover the signal, package it so people can act on it, and leave teams with systems they can evolve. I partner directly with founders, PIs, and R&D leaders - no bloated teams, just thoughtful work and fast loops.
Principles
Tooling
Scenarios
Audit assumptions, rebuild the analysis plan with regulators in mind, and ship a reproducible pipeline so the team can move forward.
Pair statistical notebooks with lightweight software so results are traceable and easy to update when new data lands.
Document workflows, standardize templates, and coach teams so future semesters build on the work rather than restart it.
Ways to work
Complete study plan, modeling approach, or bespoke tool delivered fast.
Hands-on leadership embedded with your team to guide studies and cross-functional decisions.
As-needed access for audits, second opinions, or roadmap support without spinning up a full engagement.
Portals
Process
Every engagement follows the same four-step rhythm — fast to start, rigorous in execution, clean at hand-off.
30 minutes. You describe your constraints, data, and goals. I ask the hard questions. No slides, no pitch.
Audit what you have, surface assumptions, and choose the statistical or software approach that fits reality — not the textbook.
Prototype quickly, lock down governance, and deliver analyses or tooling that stakeholders can trust and verify.
Hand off documentation, dashboards, and runbooks so your team extends the work without ongoing dependency.
Approach
Plain-language communication
I summarize statistical decisions in writing so investigators, students, and administrators stay aligned.
Shared repositories
Code, docs, and data live in your systems. Everything I build is delivered with instructions you can maintain.
Constraints first
Every plan accounts for the team you have, the time you actually get, and the reviewers who will scrutinize the work.
Resources
View all →Working notes on trial design, model choices, and tooling decisions.
Access resourceUpcoming one-pager with services, availability, and rates. Request a copy while it’s in draft.
Access resourceFill-in-the-blank sheet that speeds up onboarding and keeps deliverables clear.
Access resourceWriting
Notes on statistics, software, and research
The choice isn't philosophical. It depends on your prior information, regulatory context, and what you’re trying to communicate.
View all articles →Most analysis code is write-once. Here's how to build workflows your team can actually maintain and extend.
View all articles →An SAP that’s too vague gets you in trouble. One that’s too rigid ties your hands. Threading that needle takes practice.
View all articles →Quick brief
Send an email with a short summary and I’ll answer within two business days. No forms, no automation.
What to expect
FAQ
Yes. Most partnerships blend fixed-scope builds with an ongoing cadence for questions, audits, or roadmap support.
Absolutely. The best outcomes happen when we share the same repo, dashboards, and delivery rhythm.
Primarily medical research, clinical trials, pharma, public health, and health tech — but rigorous statistics applies broadly.
Thin slices ship fast: spec → prototype → hardened build with docs, tests, and runbooks your team owns.
Yes. I run bespoke workshops for research teams and maintain a students portal with office hours and resources.
A 30-min working session to understand your constraints, data, and goals. From there I’ll sketch a path within 48 hours.
Get in touch
Send a brief with your hypotheses, timelines, and constraints. I'll respond with a concrete path - statistical design, a custom tool, or a hybrid.
Calendly scheduling is reopening soon — email to coordinate a time.